On March 11, 2011, in Education Issues, Teachers, by Cyndi Danner-Kuhn
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
This is a letter from a teacher...
Click on this article! Fantastic!
On March 11, 2011, in Education Issues, Teachers, by Cyndi Danner-Kuhn
On March 11, 2011, in Education Issues, Teachers, by Cyndi Danner-Kuhn
My first letter to KS Politicians about our Education Funding: Do the cuts really matter?
Fellow educators,
I sent the following letter to our Governor, Lt. Governor, and all representatives in the House and Senate for Anderson County, KS on 3/14/11.
Their emails are as follows:
Bill Feuerborn <bill.feuerborn@house.ks.gov>,
Bill Otto <bill.otto@house.ks.gov>,
Bill Otto <bill.otto@house.ks.gov>,
Jana Schaver <jshaver@cableone.net>,
Jeff King <Jeff.King@senate.ks.gov>,
"John W. Bacon" <jwmsbacon@aol.com>,
Pat Apple <Pat.Apple@senate.ks.gov>,
governor@ks.gov,
lt.governor@ks.gov
I am a 9-12 grade science teacher from Anderson County Junior/Senior High School. I am writing to you in response to the current debates over education funding in our fine state.
We are hearing from Gov. Brownback that fifty million dollars is the fiscally responsible thing to do. Cut Kansas education by $50 million dollars? Well, after all, it is a majority of our state's budget. And those communities will just have to raise their taxes and fund their own schools, okay. Do the cuts really matter?
Well, if a QUALITY education mattered for YOU and matters now for YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN, then YES, the cuts matter. Especially, in my district, where 52.75% of my school's students are on free/reduced lunch and my wages are $36,000 per year after eleven years of teaching science for grades 9-12. I am in Anderson County, Kansas.
Assumption #1: Money can be raised locally. Well, it would ultimately force local communities into raising taxes to support there own districts. You are assuming though that rural areas HAVE industry to help, which in Anderson County, KS, (like many rural counties) we do not. The small amount of business that is present would not generate enough to fill in the deficit left by the lack of state funding.
Assumption #2: People will support paying taxes for their own schools. They will want to support the schools, any good parent does. However, in the midst of all of this unemployment? Our school has seen a dramatic increase in free and reduced lunches due to their caregivers losing their jobs in the last two years. You can't get blood from a turnip!
Assumption #3: Even with the cuts we made in the last two years, the school districts have made it. Yes - thanks to the stimulus money that came through last year! My school district has already cut custodial staff, kitchen staff, paraprofessionals, and secretaries. Now, like many districts, we are looking for how to cut the budget by another $500,000. It may mean cutting teachers. With the current and disturbing changes being discussed for KPERS, our most qualified, experienced, and excellent teachers (our veterans and mentors of the field), will most likely cut their losses to get their KPERS.
Assumption #4: So, you cut some teachers and increase the student to teacher ratio. Big deal? Have you ever been in a classroom with 25 or more teenagers? Or 25 or more 1st graders? What would you like that ratio to be for your own child or grandchild? Classroom management aside, the one-on-one personalized education initiative of the Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) will fail. And even though, politicians will want a continuous increase in test scores, they are cutting us at the knees to reach that goal!
Assumption #5: Our test scores have continued to rise in the state despite changes or lack of funding to schools. You cannot have great test scores with overcrowded classrooms, lower quality teachers (bye, bye vets going to get their KPERS), and by taking away collaborative time for those who choose to remain a K-12 educator after all of this. My school district is looking at moving from a block schedule to a seven-period day...even though our Science and English scores have continuously increased throughout the years. During state testing, we are mandated to provide accommodations for students who need them. However, we are short of staff to actually make those accommodations available, so many teachers (like me) have chipped in by making my classroom and planning period time available as a proctor for our state assessments so that accommodations can be made.
Assumption #6: Those teachers are lazy and making easy money with their summers off. I haven't had a summer off from becoming a better educator, taking courses, getting training, and creating new and improved lesson plans since I started this career in 1999. If you have actually been in education (and you stayed in the regular classroom for more than five years), then you know that educators must go to continuous professional development and/or back to school due to the present re-certification/ licensing requirements, and they are usually doing so on an already low salary (...sorry, my district is NOT in Johnson County!).
Assumption #7: You were in K-12 education once, so you know what it is like now. I do not pretend to know the job of politicians just because I watch the news and have been a voting citizen since 1995. Please do not pretend to know what the world of education is today. It has changed dramatically since you were in K-12. The world of education keeps changing and so has the craft of a teacher! As a science teacher, I hear from society and politicians that you want your kids to be 21st Century ready! Skilled master teachers, like myself, are smart and we do a damned good job of caring for and teaching kids, despite the ludicrous description of educators from Gov. Brownback. We are, however, not here to be your slaves.
Assumption #8: Common sense tells us Brownback's plan is the one we should follow. Voters will understand that we are trying to keep the state from going bankrupt. I am a voter and I do not understand how taking money from an already underfunded education budget makes things better for my three daughters. All professions come from the profession of teaching. To me, it seems that without EDUCATORS to produce skilled, collaborative, 21st century learners ready to tackle whatever challenges exist, then you won't be getting those intelligent, self-reliant workers that you desire for the state at any level. A well-educated society is the "road map" for our future!
Assumption #9: We'll just recruit new, young teachers to fill the spots. Common sense tells you that they are the cheaper, less costly bunch of the budget. Common sense should also tell you that they are the least experienced and most likely to leave. I am my district's junior/senior high mentoring coordinator. Any new teacher to our building or new career teacher comes through my mentoring program. It was already hard to keep a teacher from leaving the profession within 3-5 years, but throw in low salaries, lack of supportive staff, increased student to teacher ratios, lack of supplies and equipment, and what reason do they have to stay? In my content area, teachers are picked up by the private sector for positions such as chemists, biologists, etc. Take a look at how many SCIENCE education majors we have graduating our colleges in this state! The pickings are slim! You can love kids all you want, but in the end, you've got to make a living. I cannot beat the dangling carrot of the business world when people with the same degrees in teaching are making so much less.
Assumption #10: I must be an underpaid, grudge-filled, lazy teacher, and my comments should just be dismissed. I have attached my resume for your enlightenment. I am an award-winning teacher, a member of the Kansas Educators Exemplary Network, which you cannot be unless you have been honored as an excellent teacher through the National Board Certification or Teacher Awards program (KS Teacher of the Year, Presidential Award nominee, etc.). I am in the trenches, loving my students, and so thankful that I get to teach for a living...but I am working in a state under a governor that does not seem to care about my students or the three girls I have at home making their way through the education system of Kansas.
Please consider your children and mine before you break the backs of those carrying on the most important job in any economy.
Thank you for your time and consideration,
--
Jeanna M. Scheve
Anderson County Jr/Sr High School
Science Teacher, 9-12 grades
USD #365 Mentoring Jr/Sr High Coordinator
785-448-3115, ext. 126
We are hearing from Gov. Brownback that fifty million dollars is the fiscally responsible thing to do. Cut Kansas education by $50 million dollars? Well, after all, it is a majority of our state's budget. And those communities will just have to raise their taxes and fund their own schools, okay. Do the cuts really matter?
Well, if a QUALITY education mattered for YOU and matters now for YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN, then YES, the cuts matter. Especially, in my district, where 52.75% of my school's students are on free/reduced lunch and my wages are $36,000 per year after eleven years of teaching science for grades 9-12. I am in Anderson County, Kansas.
Assumption #1: Money can be raised locally. Well, it would ultimately force local communities into raising taxes to support there own districts. You are assuming though that rural areas HAVE industry to help, which in Anderson County, KS, (like many rural counties) we do not. The small amount of business that is present would not generate enough to fill in the deficit left by the lack of state funding.
Assumption #2: People will support paying taxes for their own schools. They will want to support the schools, any good parent does. However, in the midst of all of this unemployment? Our school has seen a dramatic increase in free and reduced lunches due to their caregivers losing their jobs in the last two years. You can't get blood from a turnip!
Assumption #3: Even with the cuts we made in the last two years, the school districts have made it. Yes - thanks to the stimulus money that came through last year! My school district has already cut custodial staff, kitchen staff, paraprofessionals, and secretaries. Now, like many districts, we are looking for how to cut the budget by another $500,000. It may mean cutting teachers. With the current and disturbing changes being discussed for KPERS, our most qualified, experienced, and excellent teachers (our veterans and mentors of the field), will most likely cut their losses to get their KPERS.
Assumption #4: So, you cut some teachers and increase the student to teacher ratio. Big deal? Have you ever been in a classroom with 25 or more teenagers? Or 25 or more 1st graders? What would you like that ratio to be for your own child or grandchild? Classroom management aside, the one-on-one personalized education initiative of the Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) will fail. And even though, politicians will want a continuous increase in test scores, they are cutting us at the knees to reach that goal!
Assumption #5: Our test scores have continued to rise in the state despite changes or lack of funding to schools. You cannot have great test scores with overcrowded classrooms, lower quality teachers (bye, bye vets going to get their KPERS), and by taking away collaborative time for those who choose to remain a K-12 educator after all of this. My school district is looking at moving from a block schedule to a seven-period day...even though our Science and English scores have continuously increased throughout the years. During state testing, we are mandated to provide accommodations for students who need them. However, we are short of staff to actually make those accommodations available, so many teachers (like me) have chipped in by making my classroom and planning period time available as a proctor for our state assessments so that accommodations can be made.
Assumption #6: Those teachers are lazy and making easy money with their summers off. I haven't had a summer off from becoming a better educator, taking courses, getting training, and creating new and improved lesson plans since I started this career in 1999. If you have actually been in education (and you stayed in the regular classroom for more than five years), then you know that educators must go to continuous professional development and/or back to school due to the present re-certification/ licensing requirements, and they are usually doing so on an already low salary (...sorry, my district is NOT in Johnson County!).
Assumption #7: You were in K-12 education once, so you know what it is like now. I do not pretend to know the job of politicians just because I watch the news and have been a voting citizen since 1995. Please do not pretend to know what the world of education is today. It has changed dramatically since you were in K-12. The world of education keeps changing and so has the craft of a teacher! As a science teacher, I hear from society and politicians that you want your kids to be 21st Century ready! Skilled master teachers, like myself, are smart and we do a damned good job of caring for and teaching kids, despite the ludicrous description of educators from Gov. Brownback. We are, however, not here to be your slaves.
Assumption #8: Common sense tells us Brownback's plan is the one we should follow. Voters will understand that we are trying to keep the state from going bankrupt. I am a voter and I do not understand how taking money from an already underfunded education budget makes things better for my three daughters. All professions come from the profession of teaching. To me, it seems that without EDUCATORS to produce skilled, collaborative, 21st century learners ready to tackle whatever challenges exist, then you won't be getting those intelligent, self-reliant workers that you desire for the state at any level. A well-educated society is the "road map" for our future!
Assumption #9: We'll just recruit new, young teachers to fill the spots. Common sense tells you that they are the cheaper, less costly bunch of the budget. Common sense should also tell you that they are the least experienced and most likely to leave. I am my district's junior/senior high mentoring coordinator. Any new teacher to our building or new career teacher comes through my mentoring program. It was already hard to keep a teacher from leaving the profession within 3-5 years, but throw in low salaries, lack of supportive staff, increased student to teacher ratios, lack of supplies and equipment, and what reason do they have to stay? In my content area, teachers are picked up by the private sector for positions such as chemists, biologists, etc. Take a look at how many SCIENCE education majors we have graduating our colleges in this state! The pickings are slim! You can love kids all you want, but in the end, you've got to make a living. I cannot beat the dangling carrot of the business world when people with the same degrees in teaching are making so much less.
Assumption #10: I must be an underpaid, grudge-filled, lazy teacher, and my comments should just be dismissed. I have attached my resume for your enlightenment. I am an award-winning teacher, a member of the Kansas Educators Exemplary Network, which you cannot be unless you have been honored as an excellent teacher through the National Board Certification or Teacher Awards program (KS Teacher of the Year, Presidential Award nominee, etc.). I am in the trenches, loving my students, and so thankful that I get to teach for a living...but I am working in a state under a governor that does not seem to care about my students or the three girls I have at home making their way through the education system of Kansas.
Please consider your children and mine before you break the backs of those carrying on the most important job in any economy.
Thank you for your time and consideration,
--
Jeanna M. Scheve
Anderson County Jr/Sr High School
Science Teacher, 9-12 grades
USD #365 Mentoring Jr/Sr High Coordinator
785-448-3115, ext. 126
Friday, February 4, 2011
Will our focus on math and reading leave everything else in the dust?
Here in Kansas, reading and math assessments have taken precedence with state assessments (counting towards a school's adequate yearly progress or AYP) and are the focus of the newly implemented Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
As a science teacher, my students take state assessments, and my classroom units and objectives are all aligned with the standards. We have a target score for the percentage of students who should be proficient or above, but our scores, no matter how good (we had a 92% proficiency last year) or bad, do not make one bit of difference on the school's AYP, and therefore, do not matter to anyone else. Forget about Social Studies, they haven't had an assessment at the high school level in years. I think that this trend in only focusing on reading and math will have disastrous consequences on a well-rounded education.
I can understand why though. If you cannot read well or compute well, it is hard to reap the benefits of studying other disciplines. In that light, it makes sense that if a student can master these things, then the rest should be fine. However, science and social studies offer something real and tangible to read about and to compute. Without a focus on practicing the application of these skills, students will not be able to sit at the round table of future problem-solvers and policy makers.
I am mostly worried about my own three daughters. I want them to have an appreciation for history, the critical thinking of a scientist, and a truly well-rounded, "suitable" education. Kansas is currently debating the definition of "suitable" in terms of our educational opportunities here. According to the US Dept. of Labor, the top ten fastest growing occupations from 2008-2018 are one accounting/finance and nine science based jobs. Well, Kansas educators, I think that a "suitable" education is one that leads to being prepared for competition and contribution in both the workplace and society at large. By focusing on just reading and math, our kids just will not be there...in my opinion.
As a science teacher, my students take state assessments, and my classroom units and objectives are all aligned with the standards. We have a target score for the percentage of students who should be proficient or above, but our scores, no matter how good (we had a 92% proficiency last year) or bad, do not make one bit of difference on the school's AYP, and therefore, do not matter to anyone else. Forget about Social Studies, they haven't had an assessment at the high school level in years. I think that this trend in only focusing on reading and math will have disastrous consequences on a well-rounded education.
I can understand why though. If you cannot read well or compute well, it is hard to reap the benefits of studying other disciplines. In that light, it makes sense that if a student can master these things, then the rest should be fine. However, science and social studies offer something real and tangible to read about and to compute. Without a focus on practicing the application of these skills, students will not be able to sit at the round table of future problem-solvers and policy makers.
I am mostly worried about my own three daughters. I want them to have an appreciation for history, the critical thinking of a scientist, and a truly well-rounded, "suitable" education. Kansas is currently debating the definition of "suitable" in terms of our educational opportunities here. According to the US Dept. of Labor, the top ten fastest growing occupations from 2008-2018 are one accounting/finance and nine science based jobs. Well, Kansas educators, I think that a "suitable" education is one that leads to being prepared for competition and contribution in both the workplace and society at large. By focusing on just reading and math, our kids just will not be there...in my opinion.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Role Models for Dreams
How can we as educators expect our students to dream,
if we do not also model that for them?
Too many times, I have heard pre-service teachers say that education is their "backup plan". If the real dream doesn't work, their plan is to "just go teach somewhere". That logic, in and of itself, shakes my core. It implies that education is desperate for teachers (which it is) and will take anyone (which we SHOULDN'T but unfortunately, in some areas, we do). We are scraping for GOOD teachers, though, who want to make this their vocation, and commit to it for the long term. My feelings on the matter are that you should never enter this job unless you have a true passion for it. Educating the future should never be a Plan B. To you, it should be THE most important thing. Being a teacher was a dream come true for me. It was truly a calling for me. The first of many...
People get very uncomfortable when you do not stick to the status quo. But it was indeed a couple of students (you guys know who you are) just four short years ago who pushed me and acutely pointed out that I talked to them about their dreams and was failing to go after mine. They pointed out my double standard and I haven't been the same since then. That's when I started going after every dream on my list. Around that same time, I read Randy Pausch's book, "The Last Lecture", which also served as a great inspiration.
So now...some people look at me funny. It could be my two different colored eyes, millions of freckles, or the red hair, but all the same, they look at me funny. They are uncomfortable trying to process how a "teacher", which for some is a title to be pigeon-holed and pegged into a narrow hole of very clear, set professional and personal duties, can also live other dreams. Take me, for example. I have co-written two books, work as an education consultant with another colleague of mine, have a country/blues band (Platinum Vine) that plays for private parties mainly, have three children and a very happy marriage, and will release my second album of songs this year. Oh, and yes, I'm a self-proclaimed, nerdy-lovin-every-minute-of-it science teacher. :)
I've checked quite a few dreams off of my list to this point. However, I am only 33 years old and have plenty more to go! I like to share those with my students and my children. When my little girls talk about their future, I always remind them that they can be many different things and do not have to only do one thing. So, now I ask you? Are you a role model for dreams for your students? If not, why not?
By the way, on June 10, 2011, my band's album, Platinum Vine, was just posted online for sale at digstation.com and cdbaby.com. Yeah...dreams can still come true after eleven years of teaching, eleven years of a happy marriage, three beautiful daughters, a mortgage, and a minivan. :)
By the way, on June 10, 2011, my band's album, Platinum Vine, was just posted online for sale at digstation.com and cdbaby.com. Yeah...dreams can still come true after eleven years of teaching, eleven years of a happy marriage, three beautiful daughters, a mortgage, and a minivan. :)
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
EdModo!
I am having a blast starting the use of EdModo in my classroom! Coolest thing I've seen for sometime! I hope my students enjoy it as much as I do!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)